I had the opportunity to see drug war victim Cheye Calvo speak this afternoon at the Cato Institute, discussing the heavily-publicized botched drug raid in which police raided his home and killed his two dogs before discovering that he was actually the mayor and had nothing to do with the package of marijuana theyâd tracked through the mail to his address.
Calvoâs story is well known and video of todayâs event should be online soon (also featuring excellent presentations by Radley Balko and LEAP founder Peter Christ), so I wonât recap the conversation, except to say that I admire Calvoâs enthusiasm for pursuing accountability on behalf of the many voiceless victims of these same abusive police tactics.
But I would like to address a point raised by Radley Balko prior to the event:
I was reminded of this as Calvo described the horrific thoughts that ran through his head upon being ordered to the ground by armed men in his own home. He enumerated several distinct acts of incompetence and brutality that characterized the raid on his home and the killing of his dogs.
*That they never checked who owned the home before raiding and initially literally thought he was delusional when he claimed to be the mayor.
*That they argued their violent entry was his mother-in-lawâs fault for "compromising" their operation because she screamed when she saw them pointing guns at her through the kitchen window.
*That they continued to accuse him of behaving suspiciously even after learning who he was and observing considerable evidence of his innocence.
*That they essentially hunted his dogs down within the home, yet insist that the dogs "engaged" officers.
*That the police spokesman told the press that the raid had been conducted appropriately before anyone spoke with the Calvos to hear their side of the story.
This list just goes on and on. We would be dreaming if we thought that anyone would actually come forward to defend these things in a forum that provides equal time and allows questions. Fortunately, unlike so many botched drug raids before it, this incident isnât going to be forgotten. The FBI is currently investigating the officersâ actions and, to his credit, Mayor Calvo doesnât seem the least bit interested in letting this go.
Moreover, while there may well have been some actionable violations of protocol, I think the likely conclusion is that the totality of what took place here was essentially legal under Maryland law. While Iâd certainly be pleased to see some officers face disciplinary action, Iâm much more interested in whether political leaders in Maryland recognize the systemic conditions that brought this outcome about. And that wonât happen if a couple officers take the fall Lynndie England-style. Until the law itself is exposed as an instrument of violence against the innocent, we can be sure the next bloody botched drug raid fiasco is only days away.
Calvoâs story is well known and video of todayâs event should be online soon (also featuring excellent presentations by Radley Balko and LEAP founder Peter Christ), so I wonât recap the conversation, except to say that I admire Calvoâs enthusiasm for pursuing accountability on behalf of the many voiceless victims of these same abusive police tactics.
But I would like to address a point raised by Radley Balko prior to the event:
A few commenters have asked why no one taking the pro-hyper-militarized police position will be speaking. As I understand it, several possible candidates were invited, but none accepted. I've actually sought out several opportunities to debate this issue in the past, and had similar problems finding opponents.
I was reminded of this as Calvo described the horrific thoughts that ran through his head upon being ordered to the ground by armed men in his own home. He enumerated several distinct acts of incompetence and brutality that characterized the raid on his home and the killing of his dogs.
*That they never checked who owned the home before raiding and initially literally thought he was delusional when he claimed to be the mayor.
*That they argued their violent entry was his mother-in-lawâs fault for "compromising" their operation because she screamed when she saw them pointing guns at her through the kitchen window.
*That they continued to accuse him of behaving suspiciously even after learning who he was and observing considerable evidence of his innocence.
*That they essentially hunted his dogs down within the home, yet insist that the dogs "engaged" officers.
*That the police spokesman told the press that the raid had been conducted appropriately before anyone spoke with the Calvos to hear their side of the story.
This list just goes on and on. We would be dreaming if we thought that anyone would actually come forward to defend these things in a forum that provides equal time and allows questions. Fortunately, unlike so many botched drug raids before it, this incident isnât going to be forgotten. The FBI is currently investigating the officersâ actions and, to his credit, Mayor Calvo doesnât seem the least bit interested in letting this go.
Moreover, while there may well have been some actionable violations of protocol, I think the likely conclusion is that the totality of what took place here was essentially legal under Maryland law. While Iâd certainly be pleased to see some officers face disciplinary action, Iâm much more interested in whether political leaders in Maryland recognize the systemic conditions that brought this outcome about. And that wonât happen if a couple officers take the fall Lynndie England-style. Until the law itself is exposed as an instrument of violence against the innocent, we can be sure the next bloody botched drug raid fiasco is only days away.
Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
Add new comment